Metro Vancouver Governance Review Deloitte
2025.05.23 9996-[MV] Governance_Review_Deloitte
selfology.co/2025-05-23-9996-mv-governance_review_deloitte/
Metro Vancouver Governance Review
An Infographic Analysis of the Deloitte Report Findings & Recommendations
A System Outgrown: The Urgent Need for Governance Reform
The May 20, 2025, "Board Governance Review" by Deloitte for Metro Vancouver delivers a stark assessment: the regional district has "outgrown its Board governance structure." This finding underscores systemic deficiencies impacting effectiveness, accountability, and public trust. This infographic explores the core challenges and Deloitte's proposed pathways to a more robust governance framework for our region.
MVRD BOARD
41
Directors
GVWD BOARD
38
Directors
GVS&DD BOARD
37
Directors
LEGAL ENTITIES
4
Corporations
These large board sizes contribute to an unwieldy structure, with Deloitte noting projections for the MVRD Board to exceed 50 directors within a decade if unaddressed.
The Greater Vancouver Water District (GVWD) and Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District (GVS&DD) account for the vast majority of financial expenditure and associated risk, yet board attention is often disproportionately focused elsewhere.
Critical Governance Deficiencies Uncovered
Deloitte's review identified multifaceted challenges across Metro Vancouver's governance pillars, hindering its ability to effectively serve the region.
1. Structural Fault Lines
Boards are "too large and unwieldy," with 13 Standing Committees and a notable absence of a dedicated Governance Committee.
Current MVRD board size is a key concern, with projections showing further unsustainable growth.
2. Roles, Competencies & Conflicts
Directors face a "nearly impossible" fiduciary conflict between local and regional duties. High turnover (29 of 41 MVRD directors new post-last election) leads to significant loss of institutional knowledge.
Director Turnover (MVRD):
(Illustrative: approx. 29 out of 41 new directors shown as yellow)
3. Strategic & Risk Oversight Failures
Lack of strategic alignment, no overarching Enterprise Risk Management (ERM), and an inadequate, non-independent internal audit function. Failures in capital project oversight are stark.
North Shore Wastewater Treatment Plant (NSWWTP)
A critical example: $2.8 BILLION cost overrun, severely eroding trust.
4. Policy, Process & Information Gaps
Directors struggle with understanding complex policies and are often overwhelmed by information volume. Confidentiality rules can hinder necessary consultation.
Board materials averaging 800-1400 pages per cycle contribute to "information overload."
5. Cultural Erosion: A Strained Environment
The internal culture is marked by strained Board-staff relations, a divisive and sometimes hostile Board atmosphere, and significantly eroded trust.
Contributing Factors:
- NSWWTP project issues
- Perceptions of staff "controlling" or filtering information
- High information volume
- Political divisiveness & local vs. regional advocacy
- Lack of informal peer connection
Key Outcomes:
Eroded Trust
Strained Board-Staff Relations
Ineffective Collaboration
This cultural dynamic impedes open dialogue and effective decision-making.
Deloitte's Blueprint for Reform: Key Recommendations
Deloitte proposes a comprehensive suite of recommendations to rebuild Metro Vancouver's governance framework, focusing on structure, roles, strategy, processes, information, and culture.
Current Board Structure (Simplified)
- MVRD: 41 Directors
- 13 Standing Committees
- No dedicated Governance Committee
- Complex, unwieldy
Proposed Structural Changes (Key Ideas)
- Consider Hybrid Board for Utilities (10-14 members, incl. independents)
- Overall Board size reduction
- Optimize/reduce Standing Committees
- Establish a Governance Committee
Enhancing Roles & Strategic Oversight
- Consider independent/longer-term Chair.
- Robust director education & skills matrix.
- Implement Enterprise Risk Management (ERM).
- Strengthen Internal Audit (independent, reports to Board).
- Ensure multiple options presented for major projects.
Improving Processes & Transparency
- Simplify policies & bylaws, enhance training.
- Investigate electronic voting.
- Develop formal dispute resolution mechanism.
- Streamline Board materials, reintroduce staff presentations for complex issues.
- Transparent capital project financial reporting.
Rebuilding Culture & Trust
- Revisit Code of Conduct (respectful behaviours).
- Foster Board-staff dialogue (formal & informal).
- Chair to reinforce regional perspective.
- Implement Board performance assessments.
- Invest in Board management training for Chairs.
Recommendations span across all critical areas of governance, aiming for holistic improvement.
Reforming Remuneration: Towards Fairness & Value
Board remuneration, approximately \$1.5 million annually (0.1% of operating budget), has become a "lightning rod for public dissatisfaction" amidst governance concerns. Deloitte recommends changes to enhance transparency, fairness, and efficiency.
Remuneration Aspect | Current Practice (Concerns) | Deloitte's Key Recommendation |
---|---|---|
Meeting Stipend (>4hrs) | Double stipend (\$1,094) | Eliminate double stipend |
Travel/Conference Days | Double stipend | Eliminate double stipend |
Committee Chair Retainer | Monthly retainer (\$547) | Replace with double meeting fee for meetings held |
Annual Stipend Cap (Directors) | No overall cap (except Chair/Vice-Chair for meeting fees) | Introduce maximums (e.g., 50 stipends/yr ~\$27,000) |
Remuneration Disclosure | Consolidated SOFI reports; perceived opacity | Proactively publish simple, transparent disclosure |
The Chair (\$109,337) and Vice-Chair (\$54,668) retainer levels were deemed reasonable, with no change recommended unless a new Board structure is adopted.
The Path Forward: Accountability and Sustained Action
The Deloitte report is a blueprint for transformative change. Success hinges on sustained political will, management commitment, transparent action, and ongoing public scrutiny. Metro Vancouver faces a critical juncture to rebuild trust and enhance its governance effectiveness for the future of the region.
Governance Deficiencies, Eroded Trust
Findings & Recommendations
Structural, Policy, Cultural & Process Reforms
Effective, Transparent, Accountable & Trusted Regional Governance
Implementing these reforms is essential for Metro Vancouver to effectively meet the complex challenges of a growing region and restore public confidence.
Selfology Appointment Request (AR) Calendar
Widget opens new page to selfology.janeapp.com
A Spa Day for Body and Emotions
Selfology
Selfology Reservation
Bookmarkables for SRLs

When We Fail: How a Dropped Camera Taught Us About Hope, Faith, and the Beauty of Messing Up
When things fall apart (or into