Dr. Peter Henderson Bryce

Finding Heart

Dr. Peter Bryce (1853–1932): whistleblower on residential school

Tuberculosis Φ 结核

selfology.co/Tuberculosis
Φ

Media Reactions

Vancouver’s archbishop apologizes for role of Catholic Church in residential schools | News (dailyhive.com)

Should the Catholic Church lose its charitable tax status? – iPolitics

A Guide to Apologies

During the time they operated residential schools, the churches explicitly supported the federal government’s assimilation goal in running the schools. Government paid for capital expenditures and staff salaries through operating grants; the churches had responsibility for the day to day atmosphere and school activities. After 1969, the churches withdrew from running the schools and control passed to the federal government and individual bands.

Between 1986 and 1994, the church orders involved in running the residential schools apologized for their role in imposing a world view that considered Aboriginal culture inferior. They accepted their role in the deliberate policy to assimilate Aboriginal people—something the federal government has so far failed to do. They repented for the grief and suffering that took place in the schools they operated, and the break with traditional spirituality.

The crazy but true apology act, and other fun facts about Canada (trafalgar.com)

They have an apology act

Notoriously nice, Canadians are so polite that they had to introduce an Apology Act. In 2009, an act was passed which made apologies inadmissible in court. So, saying “sorry” meant “an expression of sympathy or regret” not “an admission of fault or liability in connection with the matter to which the words or actions relate.” Otherwise, there’d be a whole lot of Canadians in trouble.

 

 

CMPA – Will you be sorry for saying “I’m sorry”? (cmpa-acpm.ca)

Apology legislation

Most Canadian provinces and territories, with the exceptions of Québec and Yukon, have now adopted “apology legislation.”

One of the objectives of apology legislation is to reduce the concerns about the legal implications of making an apology. The protection afforded by the apology legislation is substantially similar among the different jurisdictions. It typically provides that an apology:

  • does not constitute an admission of fault or liability
  • must not be taken into consideration in determining fault or liability
  • is not admissible as evidence of fault or liability

The protection extends both to legal proceedings before courts and proceedings before tribunals or quasi-judicial bodies, such as regulatory authority (College) disciplinary committees or coroners’ inquests.

 

An apology is generally defined in the statutes as encompassing an expression of sympathy and regret and a statement that one is sorry, or any other words or actions indicating contrition or  commiseration, whether or not the words or actions admit or imply an admission of fault.

2015 Apologies

2021 Apologies

The crazy but true apology act, and other fun facts about Canada (trafalgar.com)

They have an apology act

Notoriously nice, Canadians are so polite that they had to introduce an Apology Act. In 2009, an act was passed which made apologies inadmissible in court. So, saying “sorry” meant “an expression of sympathy or regret” not “an admission of fault or liability in connection with the matter to which the words or actions relate.” Otherwise, there’d be a whole lot of Canadians in trouble.

 

 

CMPA – Will you be sorry for saying “I’m sorry”? (cmpa-acpm.ca)

Apology legislation

Most Canadian provinces and territories, with the exceptions of Québec and Yukon, have now adopted “apology legislation.”

One of the objectives of apology legislation is to reduce the concerns about the legal implications of making an apology. The protection afforded by the apology legislation is substantially similar among the different jurisdictions. It typically provides that an apology:

  • does not constitute an admission of fault or liability
  • must not be taken into consideration in determining fault or liability
  • is not admissible as evidence of fault or liability

The protection extends both to legal proceedings before courts and proceedings before tribunals or quasi-judicial bodies, such as regulatory authority (College) disciplinary committees or coroners’ inquests.

 

An apology is generally defined in the statutes as encompassing an expression of sympathy and regret and a statement that one is sorry, or any other words or actions indicating contrition or  commiseration, whether or not the words or actions admit or imply an admission of fault.

Media Reactions

Kamloops band ‘deeply disturbed’ by vandalism of church – BC Catholic – Multimedia Catholic News

“Graffiti reading “banished,” “evicted,” and “crime scene” was found spray painted on the walls of St. Joseph’s May 31. An “X” was on the front doors.”

Social Media Wise

On What Matters

Bookmarkable

Welcome to
Reach by Hand Heal by Heart
Evolving the Way with Ways.